earlyink Record 3/259 confirmed · median 3d early
253 first flagged25 Oct 2026

Loan Marks: see how every BDC values the same private-credit loan

Public tracker that matches loans across BDC filings and flags divergent marks. Credit analysts and journalists pay.

Competitive · An analyst built it in a day

Written for: Solo builder

Next step

Pull the latest 10-Q schedules of investments for five large BDCs from EDGAR this week, match borrowers by name and maturity, publish the 50 widest mark spreads on one page, and send it to two private-credit newsletter writers and the r/SecurityAnalysis BDC threads.

Why now

Credit stress around AI infrastructure and neoclouds keeps coming up, and private-credit marks are where it shows first. Business development companies file their full schedules of investments publicly, and the same loan often appears across several of them at different values. Q3 10-Qs land in the coming weeks, so a free tracker launched now has an obvious reason for people to visit.

What became possible

A Benefit Street Partners analyst used Codex to build a tool that collects how different firms value the same loans from SEC filings and turns them into a website with charts. The first version took about a day. Cognitive Credit's $40M raise shows that corporate-credit data has paying buyers.

Three ways in

  1. Mark Spread page

    A public page listing loans held by two or more BDCs, with each holder's fair value as a share of cost and the spread between them.

    Customer
    Private-credit journalists, newsletter writers, retail BDC holders
    Model
    Free, to build an audience
  2. Mark Alerts

    Email when a borrower's marks diverge past a threshold or when one holder cuts a mark sharply.

    Customer
    Credit analysts at smaller funds and family offices
    Model
    $29/month self-serve
  3. CSV/API

    Matched loan-level history for download.

    Customer
    Analysts and researchers
    Model
    $199/month

Competition

Competitive

That audience has weak willingness to pay, though. The data is free from the SEC, and EdgarTools makes it easy to rebuild, so the defensible part is the quality of the entity matching and how quickly you publish, not access to the data. Realistically this works as a media or lead-generation product, or a niche prosumer subscription, not a venture-scale data business.

Full competition notes (9 competitors)

The core analysis is already done, and sold, by institutional vendors. Octus, SOLVE, 9fin, PitchBook LCD, Dakota and Preqin all match loans across BDC filings, and several explicitly publish cross-lender mark dispersion and sharp-markdown flags. So Mark Alerts and the CSV/API would compete head-on with well-funded data firms that already serve credit analysts, and a new entrant has little edge with buyers at funds. The opening is at the bottom of the market. I found no free or cheap, polished public page where anyone can look up a borrower and see every BDC's mark side by side. The incumbents sit behind enterprise paywalls, and the open-source projects are raw parsers or early prototypes. A consumer-grade, searchable Mark Spread site could win with journalists, newsletter writers and retail BDC holders. It would need permalinkable borrower pages and fast updates when 10-Qs land, and could charge low-priced alerts for prosumers. That audience has weak willingness to pay, though. The data is free from the SEC, and EdgarTools makes it easy to rebuild, so the defensible part is the quality of the entity matching and how quickly you publish, not access to the data. Realistically this works as a media or lead-generation product, or a niche prosumer subscription, not a venture-scale data business.

  • Octus (formerly Reorg) BDC coverage

    Octus publishes quarterly fair value change analysis that reconciles marks across 174 funds for the same borrowers. It flags borrowers where a manager cut the mark by more than 15% in a quarter, and its downloadable lists show each lender's mark as a percentage of par. It has also reported spreads of up to about 40 points between the lowest and highest marks on the same name. This covers the Mark Spread and Mark Alerts ideas for institutional subscribers.

  • SOLVE BDC Data and Analytics

    SOLVE is a paid workstation covering about 162 BDCs with standardized loan-level look-through. Its co-investor search explicitly advertises comparing valuations across peer BDCs and challenging reported marks against loan comps. It also publishes quarterly mark-up and mark-down research.

  • 9fin BDC Watchlist and BDC Holdings Data

    9fin launched the watchlist in July 2026. It covers 157 BDCs using AI-parsed filings and tracks fair value erosion and non-accruals. A separate product consolidates quarterly portfolios from more than 150 BDCs. Both are paid institutional products.

  • Dakota BDC Holdings

    Dakota's paid database aggregates loans across more than 40 public BDCs and shows which BDCs hold a given loan and how much. That loan matching is the core building block of this idea.

  • PitchBook LCD

    LCD data was the source for PIMCO's April 2026 finding that marks on the same loan differ by more than 5 points between the most and least conservative managers. This shows PitchBook already computes cross-BDC mark dispersion for clients.

  • Preqin BDC holdings

    Preqin includes loan-level BDC holdings inside its paid private credit platform. Its only free offering is a downloadable report.

  • anand-ujjwal/test-bdc (GitHub)

    This open-source tool parses SEC Schedules of Investments across large BDCs, with portfolio overlap matrices and cross-manager valuation divergence. It is the closest free equivalent to the Mark Spread page, though it looks early-stage.

  • EdgarTools BDC module and SEC BDC Data Sets

    EdgarTools is a free Python library with a schedule-of-investments parser, built on the SEC's free bulk BDC XBRL datasets. It makes the raw data cheap for anyone to rebuild, though it doesn't match borrowers across BDCs.

  • tpmkuehn/bdc-soi and spergel/bdc_extractor_standalone (GitHub)

    These are open-source extractors that pull holdings from BDC 10-Q filings into CSVs. Neither appears to compare marks across funds.

Checked 2026-10-25

Risks

  • Matching borrower names across filings is messy and errors hurt credibility
  • PitchBook, Bloomberg and Cognitive Credit already sell versions of this to institutions
  • Has to stay a data tool; no ratings, recommendations or calls on BDC shares

Strong tech readiness; open space is the weak point (5).

tech 8 · pull 6 · space 5 · fit 7 · build 7

Exposed

Companies that could benefit or be threatened. News and context, not investment advice.

Momentum of its main topic

102 developments this week +31 vs last week
26 Sep: 0 developments27 Sep: 0 developments28 Sep: 0 developments29 Sep: 0 developments30 Sep: 0 developments1 Oct: 0 developments2 Oct: 0 developments3 Oct: 0 developments4 Oct: 0 developments5 Oct: 0 developments6 Oct: 0 developments7 Oct: 0 developments8 Oct: 7 developments9 Oct: 11 developments10 Oct: 7 developments11 Oct: 8 developments12 Oct: 10 developments13 Oct: 13 developments14 Oct: 6 developments15 Oct: 13 developments16 Oct: 10 developments17 Oct: 12 developments18 Oct: 7 developments19 Oct: 5 developments20 Oct: 18 developments21 Oct: 27 developments22 Oct: 19 developments23 Oct: 12 developments24 Oct: 9 developments25 Oct: 12 developments
Stage: Markets

Sources

  1. How Benefit Street Partners is building financial analysis tools with CodexOpenAI
  2. Cognitive Credit Lands $40 Million Investment to Expand US OperationsPYMNTS
  3. AI:AM Highlights: Clean Neurons, Black October, the GPU Credit Crunch, and Buying the Supply ChainThe Cognitive Revolution

Status history

  • 2026-10-25 Flagged as buildable