Goodfire's 'we were looking at it wrong' interpretability claim

The coverage calls it a possibly historic breakthrough, but it is a 26,000-word blog post making a claim, not a released method with independent replication. Builders on closed APIs can't see model internals at all, so nothing here changes what they can ship this quarter. Treat it as a research lead to follow, not a product input.

Read the coverage (MIT Technology Review)

A view on what the development means for people building products. Not a view on any company's stock and not investment advice.

Every Not this Today's brief